![]() ![]() Fiala: Demonstraci v Praze svolaly síly, které se hlásí k proruské orientaci. Does Democracy Need Truth?: A Conversation with the Historian Sophia Rosenfeld. The Concept of ‘Hybrid Warfare’ Undermines NATO’s Strategic Thinking: Insights from Interviews with NATO Officials. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung/Masarykova demokratická akademie. Poznatky kvalitativní studie o fragmentarizaci české společnosti. Routledge.īuchtík, M., Eichler, P., Kopečný, O., Smejkalová, K., & Uhrová, J. The Struggle for the West: A Divided and Contested Legacy. Rosenow (Eds.), Vulnerability and the Politics of Care: Transdisciplinary Dialogues (pp. Vulnerability and the Politics of Care: Transdisciplinary Dialogues. Accessed 17 March 2023.īrowne, V., Danely, J., & Rosenow, D. Avoiding Monocultures in the European Union: The Case for the Mutual Recognition of Difference in Conditions of Uncertainty (LEQS Paper No. Accessed 12 March 2023.īronk, R., & Jacoby, W. Liminality and the Practices of Identity Reconstruction. Faculty of Arts, Charles University.īartoš, I. In Central European Culture Wars: Beyond Post-communism and Populism (pp. ![]() Central European Culture Wars in the 2010s. Dehumanisation of ‘Outgroups’ on Facebook and Twitter: Towards a Framework for Assessing Online Hate Organisations and Actors. We start by returning to the subversive potential of liminality and continue by presenting slowness, vulnerability and democratic conflict as central for our project of politics that resists geopoliticisation and warification.Ībdalla, M., Ally, M., & Jabri-Markwell, R. Given the hyper-masculine character of ‘war’ discourses, we anchor the argument, among others, also in the work based on or aligned with feminist theory-most explicitly that of Judith Butler and Chantal Mouffe. As taking these suggestions seriously may require a more profound shift in thinking about politics and society, we also sketch the contours of such broader political imagination in the second part. Adopting these three principles, we argue, would enable us to lead a more productive debate on security, as well as mitigate the adverse side-effects of the logic of war for democracy and society at large. In the first section, we directly address the HW discourse and offer three key counter-arguments, suggesting that ‘hybrid warfare’ should be dismantled, language de-weaponised and East/West thinking abandoned. This chapter concludes the argument of the book by sketching out an explicitly normative alternative to the politics of ‘hybrid warfare’, one that is driven by the desire to reclaim democratic politics from the uncompromising logic of war.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |